WAF: web and XML firewalls and for this go with Imperva or Breach but no strong push here….any thoughts here But perhaps also a little HP if they can make Fortify work (or just buy them, right) Then, round out the top in this space with IronPort solutionĬloud did you say…go with Zscaler, they just seem to be everywhereįirewall: Stick with Cisco overall but better trend setter is Juniper as well as CheckPoint R70-for creativity/vision (over Cisco).Īnd, related subset of tool check out Algosec then Tufin for management/auditĭLP: you’ll need to check out Websense again with Port Authority and joust with Symantec’s Vontu. Enough said, let’s just look at a cool solution as it stands today (because tomorrow, technology would have already changed)Ĭontent and URL filtering: Go with Websense as the overall leader in this space and add a little BlueCoat for enforcement and you can’t go wrong (or just pure BlueCoat as competing best overall solution).
![duke symantec endpoint protection software licensing duke symantec endpoint protection software licensing](https://s3.manualzz.com/store/data/022243296_1-cf950c647fe037a38fdd8bbefcb4c870-360x466.png)
But you always hear about the decision dilemma and analysis that goes into purchasing a tool-and yes you’ll need to consider the IT/Business strategic, vendor longevity, supportability and manageability, and of course integration factor. Yes, there isn’t a problem that you can’t solve with a tool…at least from a Pre-Sale’s point of view. Alogsec rounds out the solution for device and event management capability with a twist of notification and proactive management.
#DUKE SYMANTEC ENDPOINT PROTECTION SOFTWARE LICENSING FULL#
With a full package for optimized management of firewall as well also other network devices. This solution will also encompass start of a correlational approach/model…leading to Algosec. A step above is the proliferation of Tufin appliances to give you more granular analysis, reporting, and customizations.
![duke symantec endpoint protection software licensing duke symantec endpoint protection software licensing](https://img.appnee.com/appnee.com/2018/Symantec-Endpoint-Protection-4.png)
Athena will by you the raw analysis and output needed to make actionable decisions rule-sets that pose risks and correction recommendations. The list is long but the three models that serve this discussion I will reference is Athena, Tufin and Algosec…in order of capability/feature and in increasing price. Perhaps the happy median is to utilize tools that allow you certain advantages… So, the alternate becomes outsourced services provider and the cost will be a chunk though they are more inapt to solve the understanding of why ports/services are allowed to being with (and were not reference just port 23 or FTP scenarios). in an acceptable DMZ or tier-architecture model). Then, you’ll probably need to perform some level of remediation or at least negotiation of what to allow and how (i.e. Reviewing each rule entry by verifying and justifying the “actual” business purpose/requirement can be a mind numbing experience since most IT and/or Security teams don’t own, validate/test (during SDLC phases), nor responsible for port/services usage …Īs a result, allocate a FTE (Full-time employee) to chase down the culprit or just understanding of the ports and services open for any given interfaces/segments. Many compliance efforts include a firewall review and doing it effectively will have cost and risk at odds.